Report Shows $175 Billion Decline In U.S. Corporate Capex Since Recession; Speculative-Grade Issuers Most At Risk
|Publication date: 12-Dec-2012 00:13:29 EST|
SAN FRANCISCO (Standard & Poor's) Dec. 11, 2012--Deferred capital spending totaled $175 billion from 2009 through 2011 for rated corporate issuers in the U.S., according to a report published today by Standard & Poor's Ratings Services. This could spell trouble down the road for companies that have added cash to their balance sheets while neglecting capital improvements, particularly for lower rated companies. "This historic deficiency in capex is especially noteworthy as strong operating cash flow during this period enabled companies to enhance their liquidity," said Andrew Chang, Standard & Poor's credit analyst. "It is a bit like 'robbing Peter to pay Paul,'" he commented. "Companies not reinvesting in the future for product innovation, manufacturing efficiency, and technological advances may be exposing themselves to becoming competitively disadvantaged in the future." He noted that over the longer term, as the operating environment improves and equipment ages, capex will have to return to more normal historical levels. "With margins already tightly squeezed, any external shocks (domestic or overseas) could reduce profitability and the cash flow needed to fund the necessary investments," he said. SPECULATIVE-GRADE ISSUERS ARE MOST AT RISK In the report, "The Credit Overhang: U.S. Corporations Have Underinvested By $175 Billion To Bolster Cash," Standard & Poor's notes that underinvestment in capex was more pronounced among speculative-grade issuers, which Standard & Poor's estimates underinvested by about 20% through the three-year period, when compared with pre-recession capex levels, versus about 4% for investment-grade issuers. Furthermore, despite good growth through the first half of 2012, business spending appears to be declining once again according to Commerce Department data released Nov. 29, indicating potential scaling-back of long-term investments entering 2013. The implications are significant because upcoming debt maturities are concentrated among speculative-grade issuers, who have not benefited as much from the overall strengthening of liquidity. Standard & Poor's believes that many of these companies preserved their liquidity, partially by deferring capital spending. "In fact, we believe an argument can be made that this underinvestment has artificially inflated the overall corporate liquidity in recent years," Mr. Chang said. Based on our analysis of the U.S. nonfinancial corporate issuers Standard & Poor's has rated over the past five years (this includes approximately 1,400 issuers rated as of December 2007), capital spending plunged 21.2% year over year in 2009, significantly higher than the 13.3% revenue decline, as management deferred spending for all but the most critical projects. The belt-tightening continued in 2010. While revenues rebounded 10% year over year, capital spending again lagged, rising a more modest 6.5%. As a percentage of revenues, capex margin fell from 7.5% in 2008 to 6.8% in 2009 and declined again to 6.6% in 2010 as it failed to match the growth in revenues.
The report is available to subscribers of RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal at www.globalcreditportal.com. If you are not a RatingsDirect subscriber, you may purchase a copy of the report by calling (1) 212-438-7280 or sending an e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org. Ratings information can also be found on Standard & Poor's public Web site by using the Ratings search box located in the left column at www.standardandpoors.com. Members of the media may request a copy of this report by contacting the media representative provided.
|Primary Credit Analyst:||Andrew Chang, San Francisco (1) 415-371-5043;|
|Media Contact:||Mimi Barker, New York (1) 212-438-5054;|
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of S&P. The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P, its affiliates, and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions, regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P’s opinions and analyses do not address the suitability of any security. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain credit-related analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: email@example.com.